Skip to content

Quick Check Your Continuous Delivery Maturity

Which helps to kind of build a proof of concept, of CI and CD, so that they can really see your maturity level in each of these quadrants, and what should be your next step that you should take are. And, specifically, if you look at the DevOps journey, there are two parts to it. And, that quantified feedback is important, because in the past, we would put software out with no analytics, and no real feedback mechanisms.

So, that solves the left-hand side, and the right-hand side goes to kind of what we just touched on, which is how do you automate when all these things are built so differently? And so, we’re still working there, and as was mentioned, there’s starting to become some mechanisms by which we can kind of abstract away the nuances of Android versus iOS, and the nuances of web implementation to web implementation. But, the frontend is still lagging a little bit, behind the back end. So, it’s – so, I don’t see the normalization coming language to language, but instead, at an output, perspective, and at a kind of an architectural perspective.

Having a well designed and smoothly running Continuous Deployment solution will be the glue between the tools you use, especially between the SCM provider/server and the hosting environment you are using. This will also help you to onboard new people and grow your team as they can rely on a fully automated process from day one. A team at this level should look at each facet of DevOps maturity and seek to improve incrementally. The best place to start is to recognize the team’s strengths and weaknesses as it pertains to continuous improvement. By adopting a more focused attitude and structured process for continuous improvement, teams will recognize that they can improve each of the other facets incrementally and independently.

This maturity model is designed to help you assess where your team is on their DevOps journey. To support the deployments, El Emeno Investments adopted a build artifact repository to provide the required traceability. Other Intermediate level Building practices such as a dependency repository, a dedicated build cluster and continuous builds were outside the critical path and were put off for later consideration. The next step was to expand this automation to production releases. Due to the sensitive nature of these releases, adoption of the ECD system for production releases was initially slow. Given the speed and auditibility demands of the business, and a system that limited production deployments to people in the proper roles, the initial resistance from operations was overcome.

As a result, teams need a balanced approach, one that allows them to build quality in and receive fast feedback on their integrated work. For purely software-based solutions, continuous integration is relatively easy to achieve with modern tools. For more complex systems composed of hardware and software, a ‘continuish integration’ approach is required to balance the economic trade-offs between frequency, the scope of integration, and testing. And, that cyclically contributes to our productivity, our quality, and ultimately, our competitive advantage.

CMMI for Development (CMMI-DEV), v1.3 was released in November 2010. Not only that it is presented nicely, it is also spot on based on my thought and experiences in that field. The expert step is a great addition to #NoEstimate, Lean Startups with Hypothesis-Driven-development/Design and Pain-Driven-Development/design as the level 5 above.

  • Doing this will also naturally drive an API managed approach to describe internal dependencies and also influence applying a structured approach to manage 3rd party libraries.
  • And so, two years ago, in 2014, about one out of every five shops were releasing once a month.
  • As illustrated in Figure 4, continuous integration is enabled by SAFe’s CALMR approach to DevOps as well as several practice domains .
  • This comes from the ability to identify defects and quality issues on smaller changes in code, earlier in the process.
  • This trunk-based development helps to ensure the code can be reliably released on demand without the need for costly code freezes or hardening iterations.
  • Examples are the CMMI Project Roadmap, CMMI Product and Product Integration Roadmaps and the CMMI Process and Measurements Roadmaps.
  • However, there’s no one architecture that works for all DevOps environments and infrastructure, so you’ll need to choose one that fits your requirements and aligns with your DevOps maturity goals.

With any distributed organisation we have suffered from communication barriers, although tooling such as Skype, Slack, Zoom, are all helping to break down the barriers. However, more fundamental issues existed such as terminology, multiple tools being used for the same job, skills and abilities differences between locations, and silos. A further example of silos was with our TechOps team being a separated centralised group, with different goals to the engineering team. When different groups that need to work together are not aligned and have different goals this can cause friction.

Devops With Clarive

Continuous improvement is a company cornerstone, and employees in every part of the engineering organization regularly identify new areas for improvement. Many teams will reach this level after months or years of progress and simply stagnate. They’ve created a process that “works for them” and lack people with the vision or political power to spur them onto more advanced steps. At this point, the team probably has a real continuous integration system, and it works—mostly. Operations staff likely still needs to manually intervene on a regular basis. Many organizations are now releasing code to production weekly, daily, or even hourly.

continuous delivery maturity model

These build automation scripts should be run by the developers every time they want to commit their code to the source repository. These build scripts should compile the source code into executable artifacts checking and validating syntax along the way. Some interpreted languages such as PHP do not require a build phase. One of the first considerations a PM needs to address is the project team’s Release Management Maturity.

Moving to beginner level, teams stabilize over projects and the organization has typically begun to remove boundaries by including test with development. Multiple backlogs are naturally consolidated into one per team and basic agile methods are adopted which gives stronger teams that share the pain when bad things happen. A typical organization will have, at base level, started to prioritize work in backlogs, have some process defined which is rudimentarily documented and developers are practicing frequent commits into version control. The purpose of the maturity model is to highlight these five essential categories, and to give you an understanding of how mature your company is.

Blue/Green deployment – The blue/green pattern involves two environments–live and idle . Changes flow continuously to the idle environment where they are staged until ready to deploy to production. At that point, a switch is flipped , and the idle environment becomes the live environment, while the previous live environment becomes the new idle environment. This enables continuous delivery, zero-downtime deployment, and fast recovery from failures.

Like This Article? Read More From Java Code Geeks

It can also be difficult to figure out how the team is progressing on this journey. Imagine that a developer makes a change in the code after this happens you need to promote the code to the integration environments, send notifications to your team members and run the testing plan. The levels are not strict and mandatory stages that needs to be passed in sequence, but rather should serve as a base for evaluation and planning. Software as a Service has become a very common way to deliver software today. Turner & Jain argue that although it is obvious there are large differences between CMMI and agile software development, both approaches have much in common.

This takes a great deal of load off the deployment engineers and reduces the downtime of test teams waiting for a deployment. Continuous builds are a characteristic of Intermediate build teams and automatic deployment to the first test environment is a hallmark of Intermediate maturity in deployment. Depending on team dynamics, this should happen at the end of any successful continuous build or at regular intervals through the day when testers are unlikely to be interrupted. To maintain a consistent release train, the team must automate test suites that verify software quality and use parallel deployment environments for software versions. Automation brings the CI/CD approach to unit tests, typically during the development stage and integration stage when all modules are brought together. A maturity model describes milestones on the path of improvement for a particular type of process.

continuous delivery maturity model

That doesn’t mean that they’re immature engineering organizations. Instead, their processes are usually static and familiar, but they might not be serving the organization well. Teams at this level will regularly experience projects that go way over time and budget.

CMMI models provide guidance for developing or improving processes that meet the business goals of an organization. A CMMI model may also be used as a framework for appraising the process maturity of the organization. By January 2013, the entire CMMI product suite was transferred from the SEI to the CMMI Institute, a newly created organization continuous delivery maturity model at Carnegie Mellon. We achieve all this by ensuring our code is always in a deployable state, even in the face of teams of thousands of developers making changes on a daily basis. We thus completely eliminate the integration, testing and hardening phases that traditionally followed “dev complete”, as well as code freezes.


We have put together checklists in order to aid with communication and improve quality, so that wait times might be reduced. Simultaneously, we are working on ways to remove our reliance on other teams for things such as code review. There are still problems regarding story blockers, but it is hoped that these problems can be solved in the long run by either re-structuring the team’s responsibilities to match the system’s design, or vice versa. Over the last 18 months, a change has begun within the Ticketmaster International Team. Barriers are being broken down between the engineering and operational teams, our different product delivery teams are being aligned and knowledge sharing across teams is happening more and more.

Integrating the work of all teams on the ARTSystem-level testing happens as frequently as possible during the iteration, ideally after every commit. However, whatever the circumstances, such full-system integration must be accomplished at least once per iteration. Otherwise, the late discovery of defects and issues reflects back to earlier iterations, causing substantial rework and delays. Gated commit – Committing to a single trunk is risky, as broken changes can impact many teams. This is why only the changes that have been validated through the build and test process are merged into the trunk. Teams should merge back as quickly as they can, at least once per day, and all teams should work off a single trunk.

Continuous Integration, Delivery, Deployment And Maturity Model

Build and test automation – The compilation process should be automated and include unit- and story-level tests to verify the change. These tests often use test doubles to replicate other parts of the systems and enable fast builds. The goal of this study is to create a DevOps maturity model that will help in guiding organizations to the required maturity level and in demonstrating to other parties in the organization what is needed for a thriving DevOps environment.

continuous delivery maturity model

In CE, design thinking is used to ensure the enterprise understands the market problem / customer need and the solution required to meet that need. It starts with an idea or a hypothesis of something that will provide value to customers, typically in response to customer feedback or market research. Ideas are then analyzed and further researched, leading to the understanding and convergence of what is needed as either a Minimum Viable Product or Minimum Marketable Feature . These feed the solution space of exploring how existing architectures and solutions can, or should, be modified. Finally, convergence occurs by understanding which Capabilities and Features, if implemented, are likely to meet customer and market needs.

Our Digital Transformation Maturity Model

You can fully orchestrate tools that are involved in the process and manage your release milestones and stakeholders with Clarive. In this blog post, we will be exposing maturity level checklists for different DevOps areas so you have an idea where you at in terms of Continuous Delivery. Almost all testing is automated, also for non-functional requirements. It is easy to replace technology for the benefit of something better . What tools did you have in mind to “[…] provide dynamic self-service useful information and customized dashboards.”

Whereas before our product people were creating tasks faster than us developers could work on them, now they are scrambling to keep up with us. Although we still have to deal with stories from other teams acting as blockers, the flow of communication has greatly improved, and the decrease in wait time has been noticeable. Any time gained by our team is being used for “10% time”, which is time dedicated to either research or tasks that will help our team improve daily work and overall efficiency. We recently started using a kanban board in order to give us better visibility into our workflow, and have added a column on the board for every hand-off between teams. The focus is now on finding ways to reduce the wait time between columns.

What Is Continuous Delivery?

In version 2.0 these three areas were merged into a single model. If you are interested how you can work or how a system need to be designed and what transformation you need to do to reach the expert level, don’t hesitate to contact me or read my blog and forthcoming pots. We have a team of DevOps champions helping our customers achieve their DevOps goal achieving DevOps maturity. Integrations Exclusive and open source Spinnaker integrations across the SDLC.

Reaching this level of maturity is a good target for many teams. With this level of control in place automatic builds are easy to achieve and provide valuable feedback. Teams at the Intermediate level adopt continuous builds, running builds automatically upon each developer commit or when a dependency has changed.

Scaled Agile, Inc

40% of teams practice ChatOps for conversation driven development during remediation. If you just said “huh, what is ChatOps?” or “I think I’m doing ChatOps, maybe?” – check out a real life scenario and pro-tips. Another way to excel in ‘flow’ is by moving to distributed version control systems like Git, which is all about quick iterations, branching and merging – all things you need in a lean DevOps environment.Learn more here. Dev and ops teams use a common set of tools but share information manually. Dev and ops teams have different responsibilities and their own sets of tools, and they struggle to share data. An Advanced team takes historical reporting information and applies Trending Reports to it.

In the following four sections, we discuss why each of these key factors is critical for getting the most out of your efforts, and show you what DevOps maturity looks like. Before you begin this journey, take the time to compare your own organization’s maturity in these areas against the best practices listed in each section, and take note of the areas you need to focus on. This will provide you with the best possible roadmap for adoption efforts.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir